Skip to content

Learning Journey in Digital Education Leadership

Vivian@SPU

  • Home
    • About
  • ISTE Standards For Coaches
    • 4.1 Change Agent
      • 4.1.a A Shared Vision and Culture
      • 4.1.b Equitable Use of Digital Learning Tools and Content
      • 4.1.c A Supportive Coaching Culture
      • 4.1.d Recognize Educators with Effective Technology Use
      • 4.1.e Maximize the Potential of Technology for Learning
    • 4.2 Connected Learner
      • 4.2.a Deepens Expertise in the ISTE Standards
      • 4.2.b Professional Learning Networks
      • 4.2.c Establish Shared Goals
    • 4.3 Collaborator
      • 4.3.a Establish Trusting and Respectful Coaching Relationships
      • 4.3.b Identify Digital Learning Content
      • 4.3.c Evaluate the Efficacy of Digital Learning Content and Tools
      • 4.3.d Personalize Support for Educators
    • 4.4 Learning Designer
      • 4.4.a Develop Authentic, Active Learning Experiences
      • 4.4.b Use Digital Tools to Create Effective Assessments
      • 4.4.c Accessible and Active Digital Learning Environments
      • 4.4.d Effective Digital Learning Environments.
    • 4.5 Professional Learning Facilitator
      • 4.5.a Needs Assessments and Frameworks for PD
      • 4.5.b Active Learning and Meaningful Feedback.
      • 4.5.c Using Technology for High-impact Teaching and Learning.
    • 4.6 Data-Driven Decision-Maker
      • 4.6.a Securely Collecting and Analyzing Student Data.
      • 4.6.b Qualitative and Quantitative Data
      • 4.6.c Empower Students
    • 4.7 Digital Citizen Advocate
      • 4.7.a Use Technology for Civic Engagement
      • 4.7.b A Culture of Respectful Online Interactions and Healthy Balance in Technology Use
      • 4.7.c Sources of Online Media and Underlying Assumptions
      • 4.7.d Personal Data and Digital Profile
  • ISTE Standards for Students
    • 1.1 Empowered Learner
    • 1.2 Digital Citizen
    • 1.3 Knowledge Constructor
    • 1.4 Innovative Designer
    • 1.5 Computational Thinker
    • 1.6 Creative Communicator
    • 1.7 Global Collaborator
  • ISTE Standards for Educators
    • 2.1 Learner
    • 2.2 Leader
    • 2.3 Citizen
    • 2.4 Collaborator
    • 2.5 Designer
    • 2.6 Facilitator
    • 2.7 Analyst
  • Blog Post

Tag: teacher professional learning

Posted on February 19, 2022April 11, 2022

Active Learning in Teacher Professional Learning  

ISTE Standard 5: Professional Learning Facilitator 

Coaches plan, provide and evaluate the impact of professional learning for educators and leaders to use technology to advance teaching and learning. Coaches: 

b. Build the capacity of educators, leaders and instructional teams to put the ISTE Standards into practice by facilitating active learning and providing meaningful feedback. 

https://teachonline.asu.edu/2013/03/how-does-active-learning-support-student-success/

Research has noted that many professional development initiatives appear ineffective in supporting changes in teachers’ practices and student learning. According to Darling-Hammond and Hyler (2017), effective professional development shared the following features  

  • Is content focused 
  • Incorporates active learning utilizing adult learning theory 
  • Supports collaboration, typically in job-embedded contexts 
  • Uses models and modeling of effective practice 
  • Provides coaching and expert support 
  • Offers opportunities for feedback and reflection 
  • Is of sustained duration 

Among all these elements, I would like to focus on how to incorporate active learning in teacher professional development that support changes in teachers’ practice and student learning.  

Wong and Saunders (2020) defined active learning is any type of learning that involves direct interaction with the content or materials. They further explained that active learning involves direct engagement with course material, such as discussion, debate, role playing, and hands-on practice. In contrast, passive learning does not directly involve the student; examples of passive learning include lectures or demonstrations, where students listen and watch but do not actively participate.  

Wong and Saunders (2020) provided active learning strategies in designing and implementing instruction sessions as below: 

  • Think-Pair-Share 
  • Discussion 
  • Brainstorm/Carousel Brainstorm 
  • Concept Mapping 
  • Learner Demonstration 
  • Jigsaw 
  • Role Play and Skits 
  • Lecture Pause 
  • Peer Instruction 
  • Minute Paper 
  • Scavenger Hunt 

Garet and Porter (2001)’s study on comparison of effects of different characteristics of professional development on teachers’ learning, also points out opportunities for active learning is one of the professional development activities that have significant, positive effects on teachers’ self-reported increases in knowledge and skills and changes in classroom practice. They suggested that opportunities for active learning can take a number of forms and listed the following four active learning dimensions from their studies resulting in changes in teachers’ practice and student learning. 

  • Observing and being observed teaching: opportunity for teachers to observe expert teachers, be observed teaching in their own classroom, and obtain feedback. 
  • Planning for classroom implementation: opportunity to link the ideas introduced during professional 925 Garet et al. development experiences to the teaching context in which teachers work. 
  • Reviewing student work: opportunity to examine and review student work. 
  • Presenting, leading, and writing: opportunity to give presentations, lead discussions, and produce written work to improve outcomes by permitting teachers to delve more deeply into the substantive issues introduced. 

However, learners can also be resistant to active learning. Active learning requires learners to engage and participate and puts more responsibility on them. Some teachers who are used to listening to lectures and taking notes might be confused or put off by active learning activities, at least at first. Active learning often requires learners to share thoughts, ideas, and answers in small and large groups, and some learners might be nervous about giving a “wrong” answer or sharing an unpopular idea (Wong and Saunders, 2020).  

Reference  

Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M. E., Gardner, M. (2017). Effective Teacher Professional Development (research brief). Palo Alto, CA: Learning Policy Institute. https://learningpolicyinstitute.org/product/effective-teacher-professional-development-brief 

Wong, M., and Saunders, L.,(2020). Instruction in Libraries and Information Centers: An Introduction. Urbana-Champaign, IL: Windsor & Downs Press, 4 Active Learning: Engaging People in the Learning Process https://iopn.library.illinois.edu/pressbooks/instructioninlibraries/chapter/active-learning-engaging-people-in-the-learning-process/ 

Garet, M., Porter, A., Desimone, L., Birman, B., Yoon, k., (2001). What Makes Professional Development Effective? Results from a National Sample of Teachers. American Educational Research Journal, Vol. 38, No. 4 (Winter, 2001), pp. 915-945. http://www.artsintegrationpd.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/What-makes-PD-effective-Garet_et_al.pdf 

Email Address

vivianjwli@gmail.com

lij9@spu.edu

Search

Proudly powered by WordPress